Niche Content Millionaire is a downloadable eBook that tells you the true story of how we made millions from subscription content and membership websites.

Buy and download instantly, pay using PayPal or your credit card.

> Read More

We're all about creation and distribution of successful blog and website content. Subscribe now and receive latest updates via email.

Email:

Archive for Uncategorized

Four months pregnant and fresh from reading Robert Kiyosaki’s ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad‘ in 1999, Fiona went on the hunt to find the ideal financial advisor, according to Rich Dad principles to help with the big, bold web idea that she and David were hatching. That advisor was found and is Phillip Grant from Nexia ASR, who still gives guidance, advice and insight to David and Fiona ten years down the track. Phillip explains to Fiona a bit about the art and science of getting rich, or at least making his clients rich, as well as what key things every start-up should know and have in place. Read More→

Categories : Uncategorized
Jul
13

Transcript: No Better Time To Outsource

Posted by: David Eedle | Comments Comments Off

This is a transcript of the video post “No Better Time To Outsource“.

You can download the transcript as a PDF.

Hello, my name’s Fiona Boyd, and I’m going to talk to you today about when you know it’s the right time to outsource some of the functions of your business.

Outsourcing is something David and I have tried quite a lot since even the late 1990s, of which we had very little success until recent times, and I guess today I want to tell you some of the successful outsourcing projects we’ve had recently that gives me encouragement to actually advocate to those of you running a small business, particularly a small online content business or a blog that generates an income for you. I’d like to encourage you to get rid of some of the functions in your life that aren’t the best use of your time so that you can do what you do really well, which is create fantastic content and serve that content to your audience.

Just a bit of history – David and I certainly loved the idea of outsourcing, we loved the idea of giving work to people from other places and building beyond the employee/employer relationship. But unfortunately for us, some of the very early opportunities to give that a go just really were either price prohibitive, or if we were able to do something where the cost looked OK, the other side of the equation just didn’t deliver, and I’ll give you an example. First of all just something that was way too expensive. Back in 2003 with the business that David and I built from scratch and ended up selling in mid-2006, Arts Hub, we had a forum that we ran and it was called the Dole for the Arts Forum. There was a big argument in Australia at the time – basically most artists couldn’t afford to support themselves and they needed a base level of income in order to continue with their practice, and through time their practice and their product, their artwork or their performance or whatever would generate a living wage for them, but certainly in the early stages of a career that just wasn’t possible and there was an argument that we were advocating at Arts Hub that the government really should see the first few years out of Uni for someone who was an artist, as such, they should be eligible for the dole without having to get other, unrelated work.

The forum itself was a fantastic success, it was at the State Library of Victoria which had been newly refurbished, just a beautiful building. Over 60 people attended and there were some really well-known dignitaries in the arts community there, including many really hardcore arts workers who have been generating, working hard at what they do forever, and who had some really impassioned pleas as to why dole for the arts was a good idea. 60 minutes of talk time on a tape, I handed that to a secretarial service for a transcription, thinking, maybe it’ll cost $100 dollars. It took them two weeks to transcribe and it cost us $480, I seem to remember when I paid the bill back in 2003. This is just not affordable, to do things that way, so that was a bit of a trial. We ran a forum, the forum was successful, mainly things were sponsored but when it came to being able to use that content as news features, the transcript itself was just price prohibitive. That’s one example. There are other examples, we tried to outsource to a web developer partway through the Arts Hub experience, and found that they would do some bits of the work and then just lose interest. You could never really get the pay and the motivation equation quite right.

So that was past experience and I must say, every time I read an article in the newspaper saying, oh, well, the Commonwealth Bank has now outsourced X amount of call centre jobs to a call centre in India, I always wonder what really goes on and how do you manage those relationships to get the quality of service that you expect and that your customers expect and that the outsourcing relationship actually works and benefits both sides.

But in recent times, and certainly after reading a book by Tim Ferriss called 4-Hour Workweek which I read over Christmas, as did David, and I really liked him because he makes you question some of the fundamentals of how we live at this moment in time, and what are some of the paradigms we live under and whether our whole attitude to work is working for us or not, and one of the things that Tim is really big on is outsourcing all aspects, or virtually all aspects, of his life and his business. It certainly got us thinking – David had tried a couple of small web jobs last year with mixed success, but certainly this year we’ve made a much more concerted effort to – instead of just looking around us for talent to hire – to actually putting jobs out there into the global space and seeing what comes up. And just as an example for you, that things have changed and it’s so much easier now for a small business, an owner-operator, someone who is living, earning their income as a sole person generating content, that you actually now can get relationships with people who can provide for you at a rate that you can afford and you actually get what you want. An example of this recently is that we needed some web design for our Niche Content Millionaire book. We had spent six weeks writing non-stop, both of us, we equally shared the chapters and then another six weeks editing – in fact I thought the editing side was so much harder than the actual writing, which was a pleasure – and after doing all that we realised that we have the content, we have the words but what we don’t have is the look or the image and that was a cause of concern because neither David nor I consider ourselves design gurus – we love other people’s designs, we love what other people can create, but that’s not our strength, and we’ve spent way too much money on graphic designers and web designers in the past simply because it isn’t our gift, I think.

Anyway, this time round, David said, let’s give Elance a go – he had done a few small jobs with our past site that we had called calexing.com (?), in fact we still have. So he put up a job on Elance for someone to design the front cover of the Niche Content Millionaire book, and there were several submissions. The one that was – not the cheapest, by a long shot, but certainly showed a degree of understanding as to what we wanted was from a guy in China called Jay. We ended up – David ended up hiring Jay, and he came up with the cover that you see now, when you go to our blog or when you go to purchase the book, if you have purchased the book, of course, and we really liked it, we really liked that design, it said what we wanted to say, it’s not too artistic, it’s not too bland, and it really says what the book’s about, which is the story of how we started an online, membership-based community from scratch and we made seriously good money out of it on exit. Anyway, Jay’s work was sensational – so sensational that we’ve gone back to him several times now to do many more features as we build our Niche Content Millionaire website. But more than that, David consults widely as a web developer with lots of clients and he’s asked constantly for a graphic designer who “won’t rip me off”, and he has certainly passed Jay’s details on to many people now, within an eight-week timeframe. All I can say is that the time is now right for outsourcing – it’s not something to be scared of. If you know the job that you have really well, and you’ve defined it, you’ve defined the upper limits of what you’re prepared to pay for it, and you’ve defined what you expect, the level of quality, and what your expectations are, then you shouldn’t be scared to put your job out there and see who, wherever on the planet, is able to meet your needs.

So much in the past, certainly here in Australia, we’ve relied on the – what we called tried and true – but how good are they really? – things like Yellow Pages – to find whatever service or product that we need – or word of mouth, but you know the trap with word of mouth is that it’s only as good as, you know, people propping each other up, and it’s confined geographically to those who live around you – the thing is with something like Elance, and there’s another version, there’s 99designs, that is run by a friend of ours actually, Mark Harbottle, another sort of early days online entrepreneur. The thing about 99designs is that’s mainly focusing on graphic design across the whole spectrum, not just graphic design for web. But Elance you can put virtually any web job up there and someone is going to bid for it.

So, look, there’s a couple of examples of some really exciting news when it comes to outsourcing, you can do it if you’re small, you don’t have to be a big corporate conglomerate, with all the scale issues on your side, able to negotiate, you know, some poor guy in India back down to the smallest amount. You can negotiate a win-win rate, a rate that works for you, that is a fraction of the cost of hiring someone locally, who you don’t really know is going to do the job on time, and also in someone else’s currency it makes really good sense for them to do the job. Just as an example, everyone who walks into my life at the moment seems to need to have a web job done, including last week when a guy from RACV home monitoring came to hook up our security system in the new place we’ve moved to, and basically he was talking to David about a business idea, an online business idea, that sounded pretty sensational actually, that he’d hired a local person who was a web developer, who was a friend-of-a-friend referral, had spent $2,000 with him so far and in six months there was nothing to show for the $2,000, and this guy, this venture between him and his wife is meant to be the next stage in their life, and a big chunk of their savings had gone into the deposit for this web developer who has so far done nothing. I’m happy to say, that guy left here saying, oh, I’m about to post a job on Elance because, you know, we’ve got to get on with this and there’s got to be a better way.

So happy outsourcing! I’m with Tim Ferriss here – I think that the time is right, now – be confident, put your job up. Try Elance – there are a number of places, and – you know how to find those, but be prepared to get some of your time back and outsource some of the things that you don’t absolutely have to do.

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments Comments Off
May
29

Porn paved the way for membership website success

Posted by: David Eedle | Comments Comments Off

Arianna Huffington, founder of The Huffington Post, came out this week with an unusual pronouncement – unusual in that it seems out of kilter with her own business, and the generally accepted wisdom surrounding paid content online. In a conference speech she said:

“We absolutely never imagine doing subscriptions. My belief is that unless you’re selling porn, and especially weird porn, I would not go the subscription route.”

The blogosphere has picked up on Adrianna’s suggestion that the only subscriptions worth selling are for porn sites – I’d love to know what porn she considers ‘weird’.

There’s something of a debate it seems online at present, sparked by the downturn in business of many newspapers, many of whom are struggling financially in a difficult advertising sales market. Of course newspapers rely on advertising, both through the classifieds (once known as ‘rivers of gold’) and display ads. And that advertising is drying up as companies around the world batten down the hatches during the global economic downturn.

I’m enjoying the debate as it rages around the net. Some see this as the end of newspapers. Some believe newspapers can parlay their content to a paid subscription. Others disagree, often violently.

It all takes me back to when we were starting Arts Hub, our paid subscription business, back in 2000. Virtually every ‘expert’ told us we were completely mad, that noone would pay for online content. We totally ignored them. And we’re glad we did, because we survived and almost all of the naysayers are now nowhere to be seen. Their path to riches did not pan out, ours did.

I’ve always said we modelled our subscriptions on the porn business – when we launched in 2000 the majority of subscriptions WERE porn – I think they pretty much invented online credit card transactions, and especially 30 day credit card trials. Along with recurring subs, multi-level memberships etc. All of which we tried to learn from and use in our own (non) porn businesses. Although Fiona did accuse me of doing way too much market research… But it’s easy to see why porn works so well as a subscription – targeted, niched content (think of the infinite multitude of sexual foibles, each their own niche) delivered direct to users when they want.

There’s some good analysis springing from the debate. Although I’d prefer some clarity around just what everyone’s debating. I reckon there are three separate products we’re talking about, yet in general the pundits are simply lumping them together under the paid content banner.

Traditional Newspapers

This one is a no-brainer. As I point out to all and sundry, newspapers have had their day. Their model was fabulous for decades, but the inevitable business cycle has finally curved against them. The weakness in their model has been exposed by the global economic conditions, remove their pillar of advertising revenue and it turns out they are extraordinarily vulnerable. Digital online media hasn’t killed newspapers – newspapers killed newspapers. Like the music industry they spent the 1990s blinkered to the changing world around them. Unlike the music industry, who are endeavouring to defend their archaic business model through aggressive litigation – mostly by suing teenagers for ‘illegally’ downloading Cold Play songs – newspapers are dying with a barely a whimper. Oh there’s a bit of talk about them ‘going paid’ online, but the end is nigh. Don’t get me wrong, there will still be newspapers, but there will be far fewer.

Subscription Content

This is how we made our big money. It’s about delivering content under a paid subscription model, it’s also often described as a membership. Our particular area of interest was jobs and news in the arts and entertainment industry. Subscription content is niched by definition, it’s about delivering content specific to an audience, in the format and context they want, at a time they want. There are numerous examples of successful subscription content businesses online, from industry gossip to stockmarket information. Some of these businesses have been around for many years, our Arts Hub business is still going strong nearly 10 years later, as are contemporaries like crikey.com.au.

Bloggers

I reckon this is the brave new world frontier. Up until now bloggers have almost exclusively earnt a living through advertising, and some via affiliate commissions. But that’s changing. For example the terrifically popular GigaOm has announced a plan to charge $97 a year for premium content.

The rise of blogs over the past five years has seen new celebrities created. People like Darren Rowse at ProBlogger and Perez Hilton and his eponymous perezhilton.com represent completely different ends of the blogging spectrum – one a down to earth practical blog about blogging, the other a purveyor of often slanderous Hollywood A-D List gossip, yet both reach incredible numbers of people, and consequently have terrific advertising potential – and in a way broader than just whacking a bunch of Google Ads on their sites. Their strong connection to their audience, teamed with analytical tools that can distinctively characterize and segment their audience, yields strong opportunities for sponsorships, partnerships and commissions.

And now, as with GigaOm, we’re seeing some prominent bloggers seek to capitalize on the strong audience by creating a subscription product. Not everyone will subscribe, that’s a given, but even a small core of subscribers, with these sites’ scale, represents good revenue opportunity.

I rather like ProBlogger’s almost reverse subscription – the 31 Day Blogging Challenge was free, a kind of subscription-like daily content hit revolving around becoming a better blogger. It was excellent content, and some 13,000 subscribed, for free. And now Darren’s launched a workbook for sale at $19.95. What’s the bet 1,000 of the 13,000 buy the workbook. A great day’s work, and I have no problem with Darren enjoying the fruits of his labour. He works hard and deserves to be rewarded.

Maybe Adrianna was just having an off day, or, as I pointed out in a comment on a blog post, maybe it was one of those off the cuff and ill-conceived comments that slip out of everyone’s mouths from time to time.

Because when it comes to paid subscription content and memberships, porn did show us the way.

I was chatting to someone the other day who comes from a tradtional media background, talking about the differences between writing for a newspaper and online. We’ve written about this in Niche Content Millionaire, explaining how when you present information online you really need to make your copy snappy.

That means use as few words as possible to get your message across. Be clear, distinct, follow the style you have researched that your audience responds best to and keep your sentences short. Though we suspect you can overdo this, your goal needs to be delivering your snippets of information in thought-sized pieces. Not all niche content sites are going to be about news. For example, you may decide on a specific type of jobs listing site (www.greataupair.com is an excellent example) but the words and images you use on your site need to quickly convey your message.

The Great Au Pair website is a good example of talking directly to two audiences at once – equally they are targeting both au pairs and families wanting an au pair, to list on the site. In order to go further than a basic profile and to contact the family or au pair that appeals to you, you will need to pay a time specific fee – for example $180 will buy you three months of full access to the site. Notice the language on the site is about the quality of the candidates and there’s a reassuring tone to the words used.

Great Au Pair is at pains to make families feel that this is the only place in the world where you can find a credible, reliable au pair or nanny. We have used this site for several years to find extra help for our family and it really does work, but much of its value is in the way it talks to its audience and the tools it gives you to find that perfect au pair. At no point will you find on this website any confusing or ambiguous information. They are talking to a global audience and all of the language they use is clear, concise and reassuring.

To a degree it is true that we are all busier than ever and this is sometimes touted as the reason to write in short snaps when you are talking to an audience. But there’s more to it than this – if you write in thought-sized sentences then your copy will be noticed and understood by your readers more quickly. Whatever you do to confuse them or to put obstacles in the way of them understanding your message could be considered poor manners. If people’s time really is at a premium then if you’re going to make your millions from an online information business, you really need to make sure every sentence on your site is an information gem. This is much easier than you may think. It means that you need to write as you think, or as Fiona who was trained for the radio says – ‘write the sentences that you are thinking’. Most content writers and reporters will do this already because that’s how they’re trained to communicate, but if you’re doing the initial copy on your information website yourself, you will need to be able to write snappy, compelling content in a tone and style that speaks directly to your target niche.

Some of the most compelling texts in history are short and succinct. This is a widely quoted example:

The Lord’s Prayer runs to 56 words
God’s Ten Commandments are 297 words
The Gettysburg Address is 300 words
The European Union Directive on export of duck eggs runs to 26,911 words!

If you want to be relevant and really matter to your audience, then keep it short, interesting and snappy!

Categories : Uncategorized
Apr
20

People want the information they need, when they want

Posted by: David Eedle | Comments Comments Off

Mark Potts, who writes the excellent Recovering Journalist blog, has a story “It’s Not the News. It’s the Packaging” that really rang my bell, he’s trying to cut through so much of the simplistic discussion about newspapers charging for content online, by making the point that:

Maybe—maybe—the thing you can charge for is the package the news comes in, not the specific news items themselves.

I dropped a comment onto his blog saying:

This whole issue of context and packaging is a theme I’ve started to push with a number of people. We used to run a large subscription only niche content site network. A large portion of our content was not unique, it was readily available through other sources. People paid our subscription fees for:

Context – we placed individual items into an overall picture.

Convenience – we delivered in the format they wanted, when they wanted

Personalisation – we let them filter to suit their needs.

It led to very loyal subscribers (now heading towards 9+ years) and consequently a successful business.

Mark struck a chord with me because these are themes that we’ve looked at in detail in our Niche Content Millionaire book (yeah yeah, it’s coming, surprising how long editing takes).

Offline content publishers around the world have embraced the idea that their print publication content has value online, and someone will buy it. It’s a naive notion, and a trap that many traditional offline publishers fell into in the early years of the new century. They were eyeing off what seemed like the successes of some of their brethren, gorillas like the Financial Times of London and the Wall Street Journal, both of whom introduced subscription versions of their paper publications. Yet in context of their overall readership and revenues, these behemoths of the media made very little money online. Only a tiny fraction of their readership were sufficiently attracted to the online editions to pay the annual subscription fees.

These publishers thought they could simply shove their existing print content onto the Internet and sell access to those millions of words just as if it was a news stand on a corner of Times Square. They were wrong, and many have now dropped the online subscription model.

None of these publishers stopped to think about how human beings work. A printed newspaper is a particular form of content. It’s organized into sections, it has shape and form and editorial direction. It’s designed to be consumed in a certain way, and to fulfill a particular purpose. Human beings intrinsically want their world to be organized. If we had an infinite amount of time in our days, then fine, we could sort through, analyze and filter the information around us, shape it for a particular purpose. Instead we have 24 hours in a day, and, it seems, ever increasingly complex lives.

Here are the truths we have established after ten years in the online content business:

• There’s too much information in the world
• No one source of information can provide all the information

Seems obvious when you think about it. Here’s the next set of truths that follow on:

• People do not have much time to source information
• People are individuals

Faced with these truths, our conclusion has remained constant for many years:

People want the information they need, when they want.

And you can charge them money for that.

Comments Comments Off
E-junkie Shopping Cart and Digital Delivery
Internet blogs

Blog Directory & Search engine
Marketing Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
blog search directory
Blog Flux Directory